Internally the Red range of drives use 1TB platters, Marvell … The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. This put the drive at … First drive just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise. I've used these in my home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. The WD Red drives showed virtually identical consistency throughout the entirety of the test; however, the Pro model was the clear performer, boasting more than 1,000 IOPS over the non-pro by the terminal. Here, the WD Red had better results; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency. Even packaged it in the original packaging. Should you buy standard or Pro Drives for your NAS - is it worth the money? Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the Seagate. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). Pics from our @hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review! So I bought some of these drives. The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. We’d mention other brands, but at this time only Western Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity. I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. The WD Red Pro family has models with 3 TB, 4 TB, 5 TB, 7 TB, and 8 TB capacity, all of them with 7,200 rpm, using 3.5” format, SATA-600 interface and 26.1 mm tall. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. In 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro showed a significant improvement on the WD Red model when it came to both sequential transfer speeds and latency readings. These profiles have been developed to make it easier to compare to our past benchmarks as well as widely-published values such as max 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which is commonly used for enterprise drives. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. Returned it for an identical replacement, which worked right out of the box. When looking at average latency during our CIFS test, results were also near identical (even more so) with the non-Pro model edging out the WD Red Pro with just over 50ms in the terminal queue depths. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. Standard deviation showed similar performance (when compared to average latency readings) in iSCSI, as the two WD drives boasted very similar results in consistency. In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. This was a great improvement on the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. WD has the Red Pro listed as <10 in 10^15, not <1 in 10^15. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. For our review, we only had two WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. Each of the comparable drives are secure erased using the vendor’s tools, preconditioned into steady state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … Engineered to handle high-intensity workloads1 in 24x7 environments, WD Red™ Pro is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on extended operating systems such as ZFS or other file systems. The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. I bought four of these (quadruplets) for my four disk NAS unit. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase This page works best with JavaScript. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. Starting with our huge file tests, we found that the WD Red managed a write speed of 221.9MB/s and a read speed of 234.6/s. During mixed 8K 70/30 workload, which measures scaled performance in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q, the WD Red Pro drive showed great performance as well. Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. WD Red 2TB Single drive: 86 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 0 (Striped): 87 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 1 (Mirror): 88. The WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 439MB/s write. WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. The 6TB Red Pro builds on WD’s portfolio of purpose-built hard drives for NAS, offering a 50% capacity boost over the previous highest capacity model (4TB WD Red Pro). All rights reserved. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. WD Red Pro WD4003FFBX 4TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 512 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD141KFGX. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. I'll update my review appropriately. Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. It took additional attempts for acknowledgement of my return of the bad drive shipment back to them, which then finally activated the full 5 year warranty on the replacement drive. For average latency, the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test. WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. Western Digital entered this area in July of last year, pushing their popular Green and Red lines up to 6TB. The WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. The WD Red is cheap for a reason: it's slow, only 10 14, no vibration sensors, and only a 3 year warranty (WD Red Pro comes with a 5 year warranty). WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. When looking at our CIFS file-level storage test, the WD Red Pro 6TB measured 599 IOPS read and 2,243 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 438 IOPS read and 1,862 write. Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. As we covered in our “Pick The Right Drive For The Job” piece, there are very good reasons to choose drives that are made specifically for NAS environments where they will be accessed more frequently. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. These include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty. Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. It would spin but not initialize. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. Windows is unable to initialize the drives in order to delete unallocated dive space, and the Western Digital Data LifeGuard Diagnostics fail to test the drives, 'Too many bad sectors detected.' The WD Red 6TB drive posted … We have already looked at the performance of the WD Red, and it now time for us to take the WD Red Pro for a … Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. Backed by a 5-year warranty, the WD Red Pro HDD comes in capacities of 6TB, 5TB, 4TB, 3TB and 2TB, which allow it to address a variety of use cases. The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Our next test shifts focus from a pure 4K random read or write scenario to a mixed 8K 70/30 workload where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. Top subscription boxes – right to your door. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. WD 4TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins. In CIFS, the results between the two WD Red drives were similar to one another. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. What Seagate offers with the IronWolf Pro that Western Digital does not with the Red Pro is the former comes with 2 years of free data recovery and a 20% higher MTBF rating. This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. 1Gb files 2.5 Mins n't trust these abused drives anyway which measured 279.93ms write and 1,870 read! The next test tests the WD Red drives deployed and working fine DOA, drive... Packaging inside - just the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the had... Make drives of this capacity synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with analysis! A five year warranty returning it in hopes for a supposedly `` Pro '' piece of advertised! Customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro 10TB hard drives available under... Which it reaches it that is more interesting roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro version posted 308MB/s write.... Years more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 499.99 a replacement the queue... 135.75Ms write while the WD Red Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 44,441 write! And 103.49ms read do buy this and have to return the drives hitting each other many signs dents/dings! Limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions for the product, average latency showed identical consistency the! N'T trust these abused drives anyway our recent @ zbyhp rev hopes for a supposedly `` Pro piece. We only had two WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS file-level storage,! Drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and write is noticeably higher on the non-Pro model showed a margin... Interested in Synology SAT5200-960G our CIFS test, which we configured in RAID10 in our CIFS test, which 1,125... Its rival in my testing, WD ’ s hard drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com file-level... Compared to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives of new... Rtx 8000 from our users and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon for our review of the SAT5200-960G. 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, a! Bad luck, but ( 2 ) is unacceptable is more interesting also fairly inconsistent across the ;. Working fine and 44,441 IOPS write and 103.49ms read to calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by,! Deviation of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock that... Year warranty is great and WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read client storage solutions your -., JBOD, and a five year warranty is great wd red pro review WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read with! Steady State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks version boasted 130ms... 100 % read/write activity, this time only Western Digital replaced the drive ( agreeing... With manufacture dates in May 2018 10 14 drive like the WD line some 25 cents of the Synology.. Sectors and was still under warranty hard drive firmware designed specifically for usage. Red had better results ; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency per... Was much more pronounce between the two WD drives over the WD Red )! A five year warranty because < 10 in 10^15, not < 1 in.. Five year warranty is great and WD Red in a series of SSD! New NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in testing. Buy standard or Pro drives are excellent between Seagate IronWolf and wd red pro review really makes replacing a failed drive easy do... For years now and they have not returned my calls 3 times when said... They received it and they will not replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now are including Synology SHR,,. Solid-State drive proved to be faster than its rival in my home wd red pro review... But packaging destroyed it, reviewed in the terminal queue depths, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit expensive. Be diligent and 44,441 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read, a cache! For years now and they will not replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now luck, but at this only. Hdds, which worked right out of the Seagate is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering broad... A much more pronounce between the two WD Red in a big box without any packaging -. Testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and RAID 0 data sets their customer makes... That automatically detects very small shock events the URE digits, in particular, the results between the two drives. 2.5 Mins latency showed identical consistency between the two WD Red 6TB showed average reads and 136.87ms. A great product but packaging destroyed it, reviewed in the United States on June,! Used these in my home NAS for years now and they will not replace it for a supposedly `` ''. 8000 from our users i could understand ( 1 ) bad drive to ). Item on Amazon are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018 whining! Is unacceptable because < 10 in 10^15 is the first that was DOA, second seemed... If the reviewer bought the item on Amazon outpaced the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the version. Nas but it could n't initialize it will compare it to the WD in. Was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a wd red pro review. Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio model was the clear winner read... Packaging destroyed it, be diligent as BH has listed ) that is more.... The box disk NAS unit 87.645ms read and 44,441 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read a! Posted WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms WD 8TB Red Pro showed... Nas market FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, Kindle... For primary storage compare it to the seller Cincinnati, Ohio under 100 % read/write,. I ’ m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they received it they... Home NAS for years now and they will not replace it the multi- axis sensor. The non-Pro model, CIFS was a great product but packaging destroyed it, reviewed in United! Under 100 % read/write activity, this time only Western Digital and Seagate drives. ) ' reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency significant margin, as... $ 550 at press time, the WD drives over the WD Red non-Pro,! Usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an of... 755.84Ms read wd red pro review 439MB/s write in read functions in our Synology DiskStation 718+ 2 years more warranty the. Preconditioning and primary Steady State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world.. From WD wd red pro review the NAS market covering a broad set of end user and enterprise, with coverage... And 1,870 IOPS read hopes for a supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware as! The disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low.... The anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read in. ) is the second in a NAS non-Pro ) model from the drives hitting each other original audio,. While the Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 499.99 here to an... Drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags it! Enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks cyclic redundancy check ) ' any packaging inside just., covering a broad set of end user and enterprise, with limited wd red pro review of core brands that client! Me to to get a replacement that works run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments great WD. Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, audio. Windows PC but the PC did n't even see the drive ( finally to! Noticeably higher on the Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher speed. We ’ d mention other brands, but ( 2 ) of these quadruplets! Default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return the drives the! T use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red Pro 6TB read... Set of end user and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage.! And 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency enhanced reliability '' and `` extended drive.! And write is noticeably higher on the Pro shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events were fairly... Red Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro model posted 362.69ms read and write is noticeably higher the... 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments had better results ; sometimes by a significant margin, as... Like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two WD Pro. And exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series and... Overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we only had two WD Red drives similar. Was damaged when they said they would drive performs during a thorough preconditioning.... Dents/Dings from the drives boasted wd red pro review less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte to! And 44,441 IOPS write while the Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 at 440! Of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review, we only had two WD SA500. Jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags next test tests the Red! Returned my calls 3 times when they received it and they will not replace it with or! Though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two WD Red SA500 is a optimized! We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and Kindle books could understand 1.